...that I may gain Christ and be found in him,
not having any righteousness of my own based on the law
but that which comes through faith in Christ,
the righteousness from God....
Saint Peter makes a bold declaration in today's gospel, and then asks a reasonable question, "We have given up everything and followed you. What will there be for us?”
One thing he might expect is an assurance of righteousness based on the law. But that will not be given. As Saint Paul insisted, "a person is not justified by works of the law but through faith in Jesus Christ." Not even their giving up everything -- wives, homes, family, careers, property, etc -- counts for righteousness if they have no faith.
Nor, for that matter, is an assurance based on a feeling of assurance. That I feel assured is no assurance! If "love is not a feeling," as our high school catechists told us many, many times, neither is faith.
For in hope we were saved. Now hope that sees for itself is not hope. For who hopes for what one sees?But if we hope for what we do not see, we wait with endurance. (Romans 8: 24-25)
The Gospels consistently urge us to feel the urgency of the choice that remains before us at every moment of every day. No one should dare to say, "Tomorrow I will repent."
I have heard people say, "I'll quit smoking..." -- drinking, grasping after money, or lusting for sex -- "tomorrow."
When I hear that I know they have no intention of quitting. Tomorrow never comes; and the word in their mouths means never.
The choice of trusting the Lord, following as his disciple, and taking up the cross is always immediate. Neither yesterday nor tomorrow means anything. It must be Now.

No comments:
Post a Comment
I love to write. This blog helps me to meditate on the Word of God, and I hope to make some contribution to our contemplations of God's Mighty Works.
Ordinarily, I write these reflections two or three weeks in advance of their publication. I do not intend to comment on current events.
I understand many people prefer gender-neutral references to "God." I don't disagree with them but find that language impersonal, unappealing and tasteless. When I refer to "God" I think of the One whom Jesus called "Abba" and "Father", and I would not attempt to improve on Jesus' language.
You're welcome to add a thought or raise a question.