He put his finger into the man's ears
and, spitting, touched his tongue;
then he looked up to heaven and groaned, and said to him,
"Ephphatha!" (that is, "Be opened!")
And immediately the man's ears were opened,
his speech impediment was removed,
and he spoke plainly.
If Jesus is God and God can do anything he wants in any way he wants, and without much effort, then why did Jesus make such a show of restoring this man's hearing? Did he have to push his finger into the man's ears, spit, and touch his tongue? And groan? It seems pretty unsanitary! Is he using magical gestures to distract people from his actual identity?
And why did Saint Mark retain that original Aramaic word in his Greek text, and then tell us what it meant? How many millions of gallons of ink might have been saved in all those Bibles in all those languages if ephphatha had not been included?
"...went out and fled from the tomb, seized with trembling and bewilderment. They said nothing to anyone, for they were afraid."
Surely, every reader asks, "And then what happened?" And the reply: "If you have to ask, go back and read it again."
"Jesus gave a loud cry and breathed his last." (Mark 15:37)
Like his groaning over the deaf man, the manner of Jesus death was shocking. First of all, a crucified man hardly has strength to whimper, much less cry out. Secondly, many interpret his last words as from one who has lost all hope.
Too often, thinking of Jesus as God, we forget what our salvation costs. But every teaching, every parable, and every gesture of human compassion cost Jesus his life. Everything about the man led him to Calvary. He was born to die and to atone for our sins.
If we've not heard that message, we should ask the Lord to stab his finger into our ears.

No comments:
Post a Comment
I love to write. This blog helps me to meditate on the Word of God, and I hope to make some contribution to our contemplations of God's Mighty Works.
Ordinarily, I write these reflections two or three weeks in advance of their publication. I do not intend to comment on current events.
I understand many people prefer gender-neutral references to "God." I don't disagree with them but find that language impersonal, unappealing and tasteless. When I refer to "God" I think of the One whom Jesus called "Abba" and "Father", and I would not attempt to improve on Jesus' language.
You're welcome to add a thought or raise a question.