at the wedding |
Things
that cause sin will inevitably occur,
but woe to the one through whom they occur.
It would be better for him if a millstone were put around his neck
and he be thrown into the sea
than for him to cause one of these little ones to sin.
but woe to the one through whom they occur.
It would be better for him if a millstone were put around his neck
and he be thrown into the sea
than for him to cause one of these little ones to sin.
The thing I like about atheists is their constant challenge
of Christians. They seem to say, “Either put up or shut up!”
Our religion does the same thing, but perhaps we don’t
notice it so well. During this final month of our liturgical year, as the
darkness closes upon us and we remember “death and judgment, heaven and hell”
we hear these apocalyptic challenges of Jesus .
Apparently, during its earliest days, Christianity came slowly,
even reluctantly, to deal with the reality of sin among us. Our apostles were
eager to forgive a lifetime of sin through the Sacrament of Baptism. They were
willing to overlook the routine sins that trouble the community. Things like
gossip and factionalism could be dealt with by the leaders as the Church
gathered for the Eucharist.
But the major sins that really hurt the whole church – especially
murder, adultery and apostasy – were simply not acceptable. The miscreant
was expelled from the congregation and that was the end of it.
The Letter to the Hebrews spells out that policy:
For it is impossible in the case of those who have once
been enlightened and tasted the heavenly gift and shared in the Holy Spirit and
tasted the good word of God and the powers of the age to come, and then have
fallen away, to bring them to repentance again, since they are recrucifying the
Son of God for themselves and holding him up to contempt.
Ground that has absorbed the rain falling upon it
repeatedly and brings forth crops useful to those for whom it is cultivated
receives a blessing from God. But if it produces thorns and thistles, it is
rejected; it will soon be cursed and finally burned. (Hebrews 6:4-8)
The stakes were too high, the consequences too serious to forgive
repeat offenders again and again.
Entering the Church meant abandoning one’s family and
friends; and altering one’s habits and customs, one’s financial, familial,
social, and sexual relations. It probably meant wearing different clothing as,
until modern times, people usually signified their politics, religion,
occupation and social caste with their clothing.
When the Church was a small minority caught between gentile
pagans and Jewish believers, everyone knew who had gone over to Jesus
Christ . There is nothing private about faith or sin. They are
and always were public matters. And when one Christian was discovered in sin,
the whole community paid the price.
Sin was “recrucifying the Son of God!” There was nothing the
Church could do for such people. Saint Paul
demanded that his Corinthian disciples excommunicate one scandalous member: you
are to deliver this man to Satan for
the destruction of his flesh, so that his spirit may be saved on the Day of the
Lord. (1 Cor 5:5) Perhaps God would save the
fellow, but the Church had to save itself from his contamination.
The prophetic spirit of the scriptures reminds us of the seriousness of
sin. If we have developed sacramental/liturgical ways to reconcile the sinner
and readmit him to the Church, we should not suppose that sin is not horrible.
Rather, we examine our hearts each day, praying always for the guidance
of the Holy Spirit to show us the way of innocence in a morally confusing,
deceptive and treacherous world.
Contemplating the Enormity of sin, we will begin to
appreciate the astonishing dimensions of God's Mercy.
No comments:
Post a Comment
I love to write. This blog helps me to meditate on the Word of God, and I hope to make some contribution to our contemplations of God's Mighty Works.
Ordinarily, I write these reflections two or three weeks in advance of their publication. I do not intend to comment on current events.
I understand many people prefer gender-neutral references to "God." I don't disagree with them but find that language impersonal, unappealing and tasteless. When I refer to "God" I think of the One whom Jesus called "Abba" and "Father", and I would not attempt to improve on Jesus' language.
You're welcome to add a thought or raise a question.