Statue of Mary in St Mary's Church, New Albany, Indiana |
“Everyone who listens to these words of mine and acts on
them
will be like a wise man who built his house on rock.
will be like a wise man who built his house on rock.
The word has
been around for a while, but I learned of infrastructure
only a few years ago. It was coined in the late 1920’s:
INFRASTRUCTURE:
noun
1. the
basic, underlying framework or features of a system or organization.
2. the
fundamental facilities and systems serving a country, city, or area, as
transportation and communication systems, power plants, and schools.
3. the
military installations of a country. (Dictionary.com)
When I learned the word it referred to the “hardware” of a
city or nation: the roads, bridges, water lines, gas lines, sewers, power lines
and so forth. Since then, as I understand, we can also speak of legal
infrastructures (laws, codes, jurisprudence, legal societies, treaties, etc);
educational infrastructure (schools of every level); financial, social,
religious, entertainment infrastructures and so forth.
Infrastructure, I suppose, is everything we have been
building for the past million and some years and are apt to take for granted –
though that is always unwise. It is expensive and complicated. Discussions
about infrastructure are time-consuming, boring and inconclusive. Though there are many wrong answers, there
are no right ones. But infrastructure demands vigilance because, neglected, it
disintegrates rapidly.
The fool likes to take shortcuts. He will build a gorgeous
house in a swamp. Until you pick up the newspapers or watch the evening news
you might think, “No one is that stupid!” But we read about it all the time.
Houses built by beautiful lakes collapse as the wandering, irresistible water
moves under them. Entire neighborhoods disappear into sink holes. Homes go up
in flames amid the flammable brush that claims arid waste as its own.
Inevitably the “developers” who sold the lots and homes in the first place have
disappeared with the money.
Fools also suppose well-built institutions can be misused or
converted to other means. Louisville
is a river city. Without its floodwalls it would be immersed in filthy brown
muck every few years. But the public has to be reminded often, “You cannot use
these inviting hills for motocross racing.” Someone is bound to say, “But we’ve
not seen a serious flood in ten years! Those days are over!” As if!
But I am concerned about the religious/spiritual
infrastructures of a society. Marriage, for instance, looks like a solid,
dependable institution with prehistoric foundations. We might suppose the gates
of hell cannot prevail against it. Some
people who have “come out” and publicly declared they have no desire to
contract marriage would like to use the ancient institution for another purpose
– to gain respectability. They envy the esteem society holds for married men
and women, and want the same honor for their own relationships.
Respectability is a fine thing. We have laws and customs to promote
it; our religious traditions insist that every person should be esteemed as the
very image of Christ . But to call homosexual friendship marriage
disrespects the ancient institution. It is like using an earthen floodwall for
motocross racing. We’ll not be surprised when either infrastructure collapses
after such misuse.
Today’s gospel reminds us that our lives, including our
marriages, are founded on the enduring Word of God. The gates of hell cannot
prevail against such an institution. Personally I have every confidence that
the Sacrament of Marriage will survive this assault. It has survived divorce, serial polygamy and bridezillas. But I worry about the
society that would assail it. Military history indicates that armies that siege
a strongly fortified city usually disintegrate during the attempt. The sooner western
societies call off the attack the better off we’ll all be.
No comments:
Post a Comment
I love to write. This blog helps me to meditate on the Word of God, and I hope to make some contribution to our contemplations of God's Mighty Works.
Ordinarily, I write these reflections two or three weeks in advance of their publication. I do not intend to comment on current events.
I understand many people prefer gender-neutral references to "God." I don't disagree with them but find that language impersonal, unappealing and tasteless. When I refer to "God" I think of the One whom Jesus called "Abba" and "Father", and I would not attempt to improve on Jesus' language.
You're welcome to add a thought or raise a question.