So I tell you, her many sins have been forgiven;
hence, she has shown great love.
But the one to whom little is forgiven, loves little.”
He said to her, “Your sins are forgiven.”
The others at table said to themselves,
“Who is this who even forgives sins?”
But he said to the woman,
“Your faith has saved you; go in peace.”
But the one to whom little is forgiven, loves little.”
He said to her, “Your sins are forgiven.”
The others at table said to themselves,
“Who is this who even forgives sins?”
But he said to the woman,
“Your faith has saved you; go in peace.”
If the friars were to allow an inscription on my headstone (they won’t) I would write, “If you get to be forty years old and haven’t screwed up big time yet, you ain’t even trying.”
I suppose we’d
all like to live a perfect life. Or, if not perfect, we’d like to avoid having
to apologize, ask for, and accept forgiveness so darned often. We’d like to say to the Lord, “You gave me
five talents. Here are ten more!”
At this late
date I’d like to say, “The world is no worse for my having been there.” But that
might be pressing my luck.
The story of the woman in the Pharisee’s
house, abjectly weeping, anointing Jesus’ feet, kissing them and wiping them with
her hair is strong medicine. While any one of us might be willing to admit we
have sinned, few of us would readily imitate her example. Clearly she is under
the influence of strong emotion. Given the ubiquity of strong liquor, illegal
drugs and prescription medicines today, we might suppose she is under the
influence of some other spirits. That
would be excuse enough not to emulate her.
But we cannot make that assumption about this
“sinful woman.” Jesus seems to know her. There must have been some prior
conversation between them.
Despite the polite atmosphere of the Pharisee’s house and the dinner, Jesus takes his stand with the woman. When “social pressure” might tell him to make nice to Simon and dismiss the woman, he gently rebukes his host for neglecting the common courtesies – he failed to bathe Jesus’ feet and anoint his head.
More importantly, he rebukes Simon for his lack of insight. He has not recognized the hour of his visitation.
Despite the polite atmosphere of the Pharisee’s house and the dinner, Jesus takes his stand with the woman. When “social pressure” might tell him to make nice to Simon and dismiss the woman, he gently rebukes his host for neglecting the common courtesies – he failed to bathe Jesus’ feet and anoint his head.
More importantly, he rebukes Simon for his lack of insight. He has not recognized the hour of his visitation.
For the days
are coming upon you when your enemies will raise a palisade against you; they
will encircle you and hem you in on all sides. They will smash you to the
ground and your children within you, and they will not leave one stone upon
another within you because you did not
recognize the time of your visitation.”
We might also recall Jesus' rebuke of Chorazin, Bethsaida
and Capernaum:
“Woe to you,
Chorazin! Woe to you, Bethsaida! For if the mighty deeds done in your midst had
been done in Tyre and Sidon, they would long ago have repented, sitting in
sackcloth and ashes. But it will be more tolerable for Tyre and Sidon at the
judgment than for you. And as for you, Capernaum, ‘Will you be exalted to
heaven? You will go down to the netherworld.’”
In fact Simon has silently concluded Jesus is
not the prophet! He mutters, “If this man were a prophet, he would know who and
what sort of woman this is who is touching him, that she is a sinner.”
This sin against the spirit of prophecy is
extremely serious.
“Everyone who
speaks a word against the Son of Man will be forgiven, but the one who
blasphemes against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven.
No comments:
Post a Comment
I love to write. This blog helps me to meditate on the Word of God, and I hope to make some contribution to our contemplations of God's Mighty Works.
Ordinarily, I write these reflections two or three weeks in advance of their publication. I do not intend to comment on current events.
I understand many people prefer gender-neutral references to "God." I don't disagree with them but find that language impersonal, unappealing and tasteless. When I refer to "God" I think of the One whom Jesus called "Abba" and "Father", and I would not attempt to improve on Jesus' language.
You're welcome to add a thought or raise a question.