She never left
the temple,
but worshiped night and day with fasting and prayer.
And coming forward at that very time,
she gave thanks to God and spoke about the child
to all who were awaiting the redemption of Jerusalem.
In his stories about the birth of Jesus, Saint Luke tells us
of “all who were awaiting the redemption of Jerusalem.” They are represented by
Zechariah and his wife Elizabeth; Joseph and Mary; the shepherds; the old man
Simeon and the old woman Anna; and the elders in the temple whom Jesus queried.
The devout -- those who pray daily -- should not claim to be
the only saved souls. It’s simply not given to them to make such absurd
statements. But they do serve a purpose in the Church. They keep the doors
open; they keep the silence, the prayers and the tradition; they provide an
anchor to those adrift.
I hear about such devout people often in the VA hospital. “My
mother never missed a Sunday mass in her life.” “My grandmother said the rosary
all the time.” “As he lay dying he fingered the I-V tube as if it were the
rosary.”
The devout always seem to be the last generation; when they’re
gone the devotions will end. But they never disappear. We’ve all heard of the
babushkas Lenin would not bar from the churches. He said they’d die out soon
enough and killing old mothers would cost too much political capital. Seventy
years later, Communism fell; they toppled the statues of Lenin; and the
babushkas kept fingering their beads.
The devout “speak about the Child” to anyone who will
listen. They keep the tradition because the Holy Spirit raises in every age a
new generation of devout people. If necessary, “God can raise up children to
Abraham from these stones.”
Praise God.
.
No comments:
Post a Comment
I love to write. This blog helps me to meditate on the Word of God, and I hope to make some contribution to our contemplations of God's Mighty Works.
Ordinarily, I write these reflections two or three weeks in advance of their publication. I do not intend to comment on current events.
I understand many people prefer gender-neutral references to "God." I don't disagree with them but find that language impersonal, unappealing and tasteless. When I refer to "God" I think of the One whom Jesus called "Abba" and "Father", and I would not attempt to improve on Jesus' language.
You're welcome to add a thought or raise a question.