For God did not
send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but that the world might be saved through him. Whoever believes in him will not be condemned, but whoever does not believe has already been condemned,
The Gospel of
Saint John is a gospel of crisis. Jesus demands of his disciples and opponents
acceptance on his own terms. He is what he says he is and blessed are those who
take him at his word.
The great
American scripture scholar, Father Ray Brown, believed the gospel was produced
by an oppressed Christian church, possibly in Nicea. It was a large, stable group and
sufficiently wealthy to produce such a masterpiece, but the Jewish synagogue
was larger and stronger. They made life miserable for Christians by ostracism
and economic discrimination. They might have refused to sell to Christians or
buy from Christians. Families were irreparably divided by their allegiances.
It was no longer
possible to belong to both the Church and the Synagogue. In the face of such
challenges, many Jews would not come over to the Christian religion despite
their personal convictions, and many Christians might have returned to their
families and synagogue.
The Gospel of
Saint John reflects that struggle. The Church takes its stand with Jesus; he
appears in the text as uncompromising and demanding. He offers his healings and
teachings as signs, not as proofs of his power. The signs indicate Almighty
God's authorization to those who are willing to see it. Because there is no
middle ground in such a polarized community the opponents of the Christian
Church are not indifferent; they have chosen to be hostile and to bring
condemnation upon themselves. Even those who do not personally engage in
the violence stand convicted.
That was then;
this is now. There are many ways to read our present situation but it is
certainly not identical to that in Saint John's Nicea. Christians are not an
oppressed minority; we enjoy enormous respectability, so much so that we are
frequently mocked in the media. Nor do we stand together as a power bloc. There
are Christians and Catholics in liberal and conservative camps, and in every
major and minor political party. The secular news media often try to describe
our internal, divisive struggles, and usually presume to favor one side or the other.
Unlike the Christians in Nicea, we have no need to condemn anyone who
disagrees with our religious, moral or philosophical convictions. We have no
need to fear controversies among us. Even as we strive to be faithful to the
Gospel we realize we are deeply enmeshed in the world and our insight is sorely
limited. We can afford to listen respectfully to atheists and pro-abortionists.
We can honor the hopes, aspirations and beliefs of all religious persuasions.
The Judgment Day appears in the
Gospel of Saint John not as Saint Matthew’s Great Roundup of the sheep and
goats, but as the Day Jesus sits upon Pilate’s Seat of Judgment and is
condemned. Pilate demands, "Behold the man!" and the crowd judges him!
Anyone can condemn; it takes no courage, intelligence or integrity to do that. Judging and condemning are not signs of Christ or the Christian. Rather, "as you judge other, so shall you be judged."
Seeing the suffering of Christ in our fellow human beings, and most especially in those who are filled with hate and bitterness, we Behold the Man and feel compassion.
Anyone can condemn; it takes no courage, intelligence or integrity to do that. Judging and condemning are not signs of Christ or the Christian. Rather, "as you judge other, so shall you be judged."
Seeing the suffering of Christ in our fellow human beings, and most especially in those who are filled with hate and bitterness, we Behold the Man and feel compassion.
No comments:
Post a Comment
I love to write. This blog helps me to meditate on the Word of God, and I hope to make some contribution to our contemplations of God's Mighty Works.
Ordinarily, I write these reflections two or three weeks in advance of their publication. I do not intend to comment on current events.
I understand many people prefer gender-neutral references to "God." I don't disagree with them but find that language impersonal, unappealing and tasteless. When I refer to "God" I think of the One whom Jesus called "Abba" and "Father", and I would not attempt to improve on Jesus' language.
You're welcome to add a thought or raise a question.