He was teaching his disciples and telling them, “The Son of Man is to be handed over to men and they will kill him,
and three days after his death the Son of Man will rise.”
But they did not understand the saying,
and they were afraid to question him.
and three days after his death the Son of Man will rise.”
But they did not understand the saying,
and they were afraid to question him.
The Gospel of Saint Mark
is burdened with tension, especially with the misunderstandings of Jesus’
disciples. Each brings a lifetime of expectations about the Messiah and about discipleship;
and, despite the disciple's willingness he can’t seem to reshape his thinking within the
mind of Christ.
The scientific community
sometimes sees these calcified attitudes as their researchers age. They were
trained in certain principles and concepts – which were new and exciting at the
time – and they cannot allow these old ideas to be supplanted by newer, more
subtle insights. Some of these old fellows actually developed the breakthrough
concepts of the last generation and they’re still waiting for the rest of the
community to catch on.
Then one day they wake
up to realize, “My future has passed.” and what they had envisioned will never happen.
The circumstances that were supposed to provide a window of opportunity never
happened. The road they took was the road less taken, and no one followed. Eventually
they retire or die and the next generation faces the same cycle of new insights
and challenges.
This cycle plays itself
out among the physical and social sciences. It is also true of philosophers and
theologians. But the latter are especially reluctant to accept new ways of thinking
because they claim ownership of, and feel they must defend, "The Truth."
Jesus knows the window
of opportunity when he must teach his disciples how to think, see and respond
is dreadfully short. His enemies are closing in on him and his disciples are
still squabbling like children about “who is the greatest among them.” He teaches service and
they want mastery! He teaches obedience and sacrifice and humility and they
want command, control and supremacy.
He can only hope to give
them powerful examples, ineradicable memories that the Holy Spirit will use to
explain what must happen in Jerusalem. Was his going to Jerusalem despite all the
warnings something like the behavior of an obedient child? Was his silence
before his accusers a sign of his being the
last of all and the servant of all? Was his resurrection, even after his
last despairing cry of total abandonment, a sign of God’s fidelity? And is that
how we should live?
Jesus, as Saint Mark
tells the story, continually knocks against the stony hardness of his disciples’
understanding. They will not understand anything he says until he is raised up;
and yet they must be drawn to him as certainly as iron to a magnet, as heavy
weights to earth, as flowers to sunlight – as living things to death.
They will die with him
on Calvary. All their hopes, expectations, understandings, desires and
ambitions will fail on that day. They will have neither reason to live nor hope
for satisfaction once the sun has set on Calvary. And then, come Easter, they
will begin to understand.
No comments:
Post a Comment
I love to write. This blog helps me to meditate on the Word of God, and I hope to make some contribution to our contemplations of God's Mighty Works.
Ordinarily, I write these reflections two or three weeks in advance of their publication. I do not intend to comment on current events.
I understand many people prefer gender-neutral references to "God." I don't disagree with them but find that language impersonal, unappealing and tasteless. When I refer to "God" I think of the One whom Jesus called "Abba" and "Father", and I would not attempt to improve on Jesus' language.
You're welcome to add a thought or raise a question.