And yet this gospel, of the four, describes the earthiest, most
plausible political scenes; such as the fussing between Nicodemus and his
fellow members of the Sanhedrin. He argues principle; they retort with threatening
insinuations. As the crisis of Jesus ’ trial
approaches, lines are drawn and sides are taken. Reason, open-mindedness,
patience, and charity are thrown out the door.
Perhaps the most damning line in
this passage is the last sentence, short and penetrating: Then each went to his own house.
These policy-setting, decision-making leaders just don’t
care. They have their homes and comforts and certain certainties. They have
made their compromises with the Herodian aristocrats and the Roman
rulers and the Levite priests; nothing more should be asked of them. The arrival of the Son of
God in Jerusalem is no more than the
latest nuisance; a flea on an elephant’s hide to be crushed. By next week the
incident will be forgotten as other threats to their security arise.
T. S. Eliot
might have been describing the banality of their evil and the transparent goodness of Jesus when he wrote Preludes:
His soul stretched tight across the skies
That fade behind a city block,
Or trampled by insistent feet
At four and five andsix o'clock ;
And short square fingers stuffing pipes,
And evening newspapers, and eyes
Assured of certain certainties,
That fade behind a city block,
Or trampled by insistent feet
At four and five and
And short square fingers stuffing pipes,
And evening newspapers, and eyes
Assured of certain certainties,
The conscience of a blackened street
Impatient to assume the world.
Impatient to assume the world.
I am moved by fancies that are curled
Around these images, and cling:
The notion of some infinitely gentle
Infinitely suffering thing.
No comments:
Post a Comment
I love to write. This blog helps me to meditate on the Word of God, and I hope to make some contribution to our contemplations of God's Mighty Works.
Ordinarily, I write these reflections two or three weeks in advance of their publication. I do not intend to comment on current events.
I understand many people prefer gender-neutral references to "God." I don't disagree with them but find that language impersonal, unappealing and tasteless. When I refer to "God" I think of the One whom Jesus called "Abba" and "Father", and I would not attempt to improve on Jesus' language.
You're welcome to add a thought or raise a question.