Because
there arose no little dissension and debate
by Paul and Barnabas with them,
it was decided thatPaul , Barnabas , and some of the others
should go up toJerusalem to the Apostles and presbyters
about this question.
it was decided that
should go up to
about this question.
It seems the first Christians were not as naïve about religion and
spirituality as many American Christians. They did not suppose saints should
be free of controversy. The Acts of the Apostles records not only the
successful movement of the faith from Jerusalem to the “ends of
the earth;” it also documents the first crisis of the faith. Saint Luke , the mildest of
the New Testament authors, often puts a benign spin on his reporting, but
he does not skip over this quarrel.
The conflict first appeared concerning the care of Jewish and gentile
widows. Despite their good intentions the distributors of alms, perhaps
unconsciously, were favoring the Jewish poor. If the benefactors could not see
it, as they often don’t, the recipients did. Their complaints led to the first
major reorganization of the church and the appointment of “deacons” to manage
the day to day affairs.
But as more and more gentiles joined the church and the Jews found
themselves a shrinking minority, some of them introduced policies to stem the
tide of new converts:
Unless you are circumcised
according to the Mosaic practice, you cannot be saved.”
Most men would find that a daunting prospect. How many people today
insist they believe in Jesus but cannot pay the
price of church attendance? If minor surgery of the most painful and personal
kind were required of them, even fewer would come out!
But the argument could not be dismissed outright. The apostles and first
leaders were all Jews and felt an intense loyalty to the Mosaic Law. Many still
hoped that all Jews would come over to Christ ; others believed
that Jesus ’ mission was to
the Jews but not to the entire world. If a few gentiles joined the fold that
was no problem; but if the church became majority gentile, it would certainly
lose its focus on baptizing Judaism.
The controversy finally came to a head and the leaders gathered to
discuss it. They would not sweep their differences under the rug and allow the
church to be shattered by varying opinions. As they met in Jerusalem they remembered
clearly the prayer of Jesus at the Last
Supper – that all should be one (John 17:21 ).
(When people today wonder why the Church seems so backward in some
policies and so forward in others, they should consider the challenge of keeping
an international church of rich and poor, sophisticated and rough, old and
young, and every imaginable culture together.)
Their decision, prompted by the Holy Spirit, for unity and universality would
change the course of the Church forever.
No comments:
Post a Comment
I love to write. This blog helps me to meditate on the Word of God, and I hope to make some contribution to our contemplations of God's Mighty Works.
Ordinarily, I write these reflections two or three weeks in advance of their publication. I do not intend to comment on current events.
I understand many people prefer gender-neutral references to "God." I don't disagree with them but find that language impersonal, unappealing and tasteless. When I refer to "God" I think of the One whom Jesus called "Abba" and "Father", and I would not attempt to improve on Jesus' language.
You're welcome to add a thought or raise a question.