You once were alienated and hostile in mind because of evil deeds;
God has now reconciled you
in the fleshly Body of Christ through his death...
As we celebrate the feast of Saint Peter Claver, the self-described "Slave of the slaves," we remember Saint Paul's characterizations of his converts' former way of life: they were "alienated and hostile in mind because of evil deeds."
Different translations render the verse differently, but in this New American Bible Revised Edition (NABRE), favored by the Catholic Church in the United States, the doers of "evil deeds" are not specified. Was it you who were once alienated and hostile in mind? Or was it those who did evil deeds to you?
In my work at the VA I came to appreciate how people suffer moral injury by things they have done, by things done to them, and by evil deeds they have seen and could not prevent. Millions of African people were brought to the Caribbeans islands, and to North and South America as slaves. This was an unspeakable crime which left them and their descendants "alienated and hostile in mind."
If some southern landowners in the United States, and many northern politicians supposed the Civil War eliminated slavery and cancelled alienation and hostility among the freed people, they were guilty of willful ignorance. By 1870, only a few years after the War, the Party of Lincoln had lost all interest in easing the plight of former slaves. (According to David Blight, in his biography of Frederick Douglass, the party's concern was to win votes and stay in power, not fairness and equality.) America has often been the land of quick fixes and easy solutions, of cancelling the past, and plunging recklessly toward a future of greater disparity.
No comments:
Post a Comment
I love to write. This blog helps me to meditate on the Word of God, and I hope to make some contribution to our contemplations of God's Mighty Works.
Ordinarily, I write these reflections two or three weeks in advance of their publication. I do not intend to comment on current events.
I understand many people prefer gender-neutral references to "God." I don't disagree with them but find that language impersonal, unappealing and tasteless. When I refer to "God" I think of the One whom Jesus called "Abba" and "Father", and I would not attempt to improve on Jesus' language.
You're welcome to add a thought or raise a question.