Some Sadducees, those who deny that there is a resurrection, came forward and put this question to Jesus....
November is the month when we remember the mysteries of "death and judgement, heaven and hell." We're rapidly approaching the end of the year, and will celebrate Christ the King of the Universe on Sunday, November 20.
It would be easy to be distracted by the Sadducees' question in today's gospel, about a woman seven times married and seven times widowed. It's a "what if" question concerning the afterlife; and is designed to fluster and frustrate a teacher of religion. Which is not hard to do since our doctrines are very serious; they address matters of life and death. They are not designed to answer inane questions from silly persons. We say that God will raise up his faithful people from the dead, but we have no idea how he'll do that. Nor can we imagine an endless "resurrection of the body."
....they preferred to die rather than to be defiled with food or to profane the holy covenant; and they did die. And very great wrath came upon Israel.
The murder of the widow and her sons is particularly horrible -- (today's lectionary passage is severely abridged) -- but it was only one instance of the violence.
Is it possible that the painful death of these heroic men and women will be ignored by the Lord God of Heaven and Earth? Will the All-Powerful and All Just not reward their fidelity. If death is really the final end of human life, and there is no heaven, then our God is not so very powerful after all! Death is more powerful, more real, and more important.
There can be only two responses to that conundrum. We might ignore death, pretending "it won't happen to me." I heard a journalist ask a Russian correspondent if Vladimir Putin is grooming a successor. She replied, "Vladimir Putin does not plan to die." But in that respect he is like millions of people.
The other response is to believe our God is indeed more powerful, more faithful, and more beautiful than death. Our God will conquer death and make it beautiful for those who die in the faith.
And so we can take the Sadducees' mocking question seriously. Jesus' replied,
...those who are deemed worthy to attain to the coming age and to the resurrection of the dead neither marry nor are given in marriage. They can no longer die, for they are like angels; and they are the children of God because they are the ones who will rise.
In her book, The Genesis of Gender, a Christian theory, Abigail Rine Favoli, notices that Jesus refers to the creation narrative of Genesis and not to the Mosaic Law. The Lord...
"turns our eyes back toward Genesis and urges us with divine help to reclaim the goodness of the created order, the gift of our bodies and the earth, and to cultivate anew a dynamic reciprocity between the sexes." He "would restore the original order."
The "coming age" will resemble Eden rather than the ideal world of the Sadducees' or Pharisees' where men retain a sinful superiority over women. The relations of men and women will recognize their equality, their sexual complementarity, and their unashamed beauty like Adam and Eve in the Garden. Like angels who know nothing of death, they will enjoy the freedom of God's children.
And finally, he reminds his skeptical opponent of what should be obvious, "He is not God of the dead, but of the living, for to him all are alive."
From its earliest days the Church has cultivated our friendship with the martyrs and saints; they are a living cloud of witnesses and we are as assured of their friendship as we are of God's sovereign authority. If we're never satisfied in this world -- as the Sadducees appear to be -- it's because we're looking forward to the satisfaction promised to the children of God.
No comments:
Post a Comment
I love to write. This blog helps me to meditate on the Word of God, and I hope to make some contribution to our contemplations of God's Mighty Works.
Ordinarily, I write these reflections two or three weeks in advance of their publication. I do not intend to comment on current events.
I understand many people prefer gender-neutral references to "God." I don't disagree with them but find that language impersonal, unappealing and tasteless. When I refer to "God" I think of the One whom Jesus called "Abba" and "Father", and I would not attempt to improve on Jesus' language.
You're welcome to add a thought or raise a question.