Monday, May 31, 2010

The Feast of the Visitation of Mary and Elizabeth



On March 25th we celebrated the Feast of the Annunciation, when the Angel Gabriel announced to Mary that she would be the Mother of God. Today we celebrate her visit with Elizabeth, the mother of John the Baptist; and in a few more weeks we’ll recall John’s birth. Our annual cycle of feasts never gets very far from Christmas.

Some biblical scholars regard this story of Mary’s visit to Elizabeth as the high point of Saint Luke’s Infancy Narrative, although our tradition stresses the birth of Jesus. There are five stories in the set that make up this narrative, plus two stories about Jesus in the temple. The first two stories describe Gabriel’s announcements to Zechariah and Mary. The fourth and fifth are about the births of John and Jesus. These story lines might be two different histories except for their intersection with Mary’s visit and the aria she sings, the Magnificat. With this literary device Saint Luke accentuates the hidden roles of Mary and Elizabeth. They represent the Old and New Jerusalem, the people of God who have been and will always be attentive and eager to welcome God's intervention in our world. 

An unknown Kentucky poet has written of the Visitation:
Enticed, thy grace to her fecundity
discovered unexpected mother lodes
of courage in this woman-child. With glee
she braved the roads and disapproving scolds,
exploring fearlessly the angel’s bond.
She means to witness in her cousin’s room
the wind-blown benefit so far beyond
ancestral hopes, now seen in barren womb.
As ancient Betty hailed the queen of light
beneath the searching eyes of Roman rod
and Mary sang the failure of the night,
the solstice child saluted solstice God.
No power of earth supposed what these four knew,
the Providence that loves the least is true.


No comments:

Post a Comment

I love to write. This blog helps me to meditate on the Word of God, and I hope to make some contribution to our contemplations of God's Mighty Works.

Ordinarily, I write these reflections two or three weeks in advance of their publication. I do not intend to comment on current events.

I understand many people prefer gender-neutral references to "God." I don't disagree with them but find that language impersonal, unappealing and tasteless. When I refer to "God" I think of the One whom Jesus called "Abba" and "Father", and I would not attempt to improve on Jesus' language.

You're welcome to add a thought or raise a question.