Pentecost ranks with Christmas and Easter as one of the most
important festivals of our church. Because the Second Vatican Council directed its
attention primarily to the mystery of the church I look forward to a day when Pentecost
will be celebrated with far more pomp and circumstance than it enjoys today. During
the first centuries the church “defined” – or at least attempted to put into
words – the mysteries of Jesus and God. The
second millennium took up the doctrines of the Eucharist and sacraments. So now,
with the millennium of the laity upon us, we ponder the mystery of Church.
And we begin this new enterprise when many Christians prefer
there be no church at all! They would direct all their attention and devotion
to Jesus , without the trappings and bother of “organized
religion.”
This impulse to drop out of church and focus exclusively on Jesus
– a temptation that has its own ancient history and tradition – is a sign of
the great success of the church. It demonstrates how effectively we have practiced
the Baptist’s words:
He must
increase; I must decrease.
People believe they can meet Jesus
directly without the distorting influence of the Church. Many insist they have
found the true Jesus despite the omnipresence of
the Church. After all these centuries they have met the Lord who was sorely
misunderstood by his own immediate disciples but now, at last, is seen clearly
twenty centuries later.
Their enthusiasm reminds me of my mother's remark about my brother-in-law's excitement when my sister had her first baby. She said, “You would think they just invented babies!” These
new Christians are so ecstatic about Jesus they
fail to notice the Church which has faithfully practiced his mission all these
centuries.
But adult Christians must finally take up their own
responsibilities to be Church . It was the communities of
disciples in ancient cities of the Roman Empire that
first commissioned scholars to produce the gospels. They were sufficiently
well-organized to sponsor the project, allowing the specialists the leisure to
discuss and argue, write, edit and publish what should and should not be
transmitted to the ages.
That same church treasured the work of those committees –
known today as Matthew , Mark ,
Luke , and John – and
distributed copies throughout the known world by way of the missionaries whom
they also sponsored. They placed these gospels within our sacred liturgies; reading,
pondering and interpreting them for the Sunday congregations. When the time came the Church reselected those four gospels
and dismissed later documents – the so-called Gnostic gospels.
As the original gospel manuscripts moldered, the Church scrupulously
copied them again and again until we have only copies of copies of copies; and
yet we’re sure these gospels are faithful renditions of the originals.
This well-organized Church, throughout the centuries, has
continued to sponsor scholars who study and translate the scriptures, helping
us to announce them to everyone on earth. Saint
Luke described this miracle with his story
of Jesus ’ disciples speaking to Parthians, Medes, and Elamites, inhabitants of Mesopotamia , Judea and Cappadocia ,
The idealist supposes that Jesus
would and should be known without the Church. Like the game of baseball in the
movie, “Field of Dreams” they suppose, “If you build it, they will come.” It
will just happen mystically.
But Jesus knew there can be no Gospel without a Church to announce it. This hoary old “institution” has received his presence –
spiritual and physical -- from each passing generation and faithfully passed it
to the next. The man himself would have been long forgotten – risen or not –
without the men and women who loved him enough to tell their loved ones about
him.
On the feast of Pentecost we thank God for the privilege of such a beautiful, adult responsibility.
On the feast of Pentecost we thank God for the privilege of such a beautiful, adult responsibility.
No comments:
Post a Comment
I love to write. This blog helps me to meditate on the Word of God, and I hope to make some contribution to our contemplations of God's Mighty Works.
Ordinarily, I write these reflections two or three weeks in advance of their publication. I do not intend to comment on current events.
I understand many people prefer gender-neutral references to "God." I don't disagree with them but find that language impersonal, unappealing and tasteless. When I refer to "God" I think of the One whom Jesus called "Abba" and "Father", and I would not attempt to improve on Jesus' language.
You're welcome to add a thought or raise a question.